Keywords
translational medical research
evaluation of healthcare programs and projects
How to Cite
Abstract
This paper analyzes the use of a hybrid model for the evaluation of the Bachelor’s Degree in Public Health (BDPH) of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. The evaluation sought to improve the teaching of the Bachelor’s Degree in Public Health and to propose alternative approaches for evaluating teaching and learning initiatives. It was assumed that in contemporary knowledge- based societies, teaching and learning processes can be better appreciated and valued within the scope of translational operations that mediate the construction of socio-technical networks. A comparative analysis of inclusive evaluation models supported the selection of the collaborative approach. The models were compared using participatory, empowered, collaborative and translational approaches based on the fundamental attributes underlying evaluation processes: knowledge production, assessment, uses, and influences. The findings point to the insufficiency of a single approach in capturing the complexity of reality and suggest there is a need for a critical, translational hybridization of the different models.References
Luz M. Complexidade do Campo da Saúde Coletiva: multidisciplinaridade, interdisciplinaridade, e transdisciplinaridade de saberes e práticas - análise sócio-histórica de uma trajetória paradigmática. Saúde soc. 2009; 18(2):304-11. [Acesso: 16/03/2018] Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S0104-12902009000200013.
Santos L. Educação e Trabalho na Saúde Coletiva Brasileira: estudo de caso sobre a criação dos cursos de graduação na área de Saúde Coletiva nos cenários nacional e local. Tese de Doutorado. Salvador: Instituto de Saúde da Comunidade/UFBA. 2014.
La salud en las Américas. Organización Panamericana de la Salud. 2002.
Diretrizes Curriculares Nacionais do Curso de Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Brasil. Ministério da Educação. 2017. [Acesso: 28/05/2018] Disponível en: http://portal.mec.gov.br/docman/ setembro-2017-pdf/72431-pces242-17-pdf/file.
Decreto 6.096 de 24 de abril de 2007. Institui o Programa de Apoio a Planos de Reestruturação e Expansão das Universidades Federais – REUNI. Brasil. Diário Oficial da União 2007; 25 abril.
Abrasco. Abrasco cria o Fórum de Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. Boletim no 105 Informativo da Associação Brasileira de Pós- Graduação em Saúde Coletiva ANO XXVII dezembro, 2010. [Acesso: 28/05/2018] Disponível em: https://www.abrasco.org.br/ site/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/BOLETIM-105_SITE.pdf.
Koifman L, Gomes LN. A graduação em saúde coletiva: um debate ou uma realidade?. Rev. bras. educ. med. 2008; 32(4):417-8. [Acesso: 28/05/2018] Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/ S0100-55022008000400001.
Paro CA. Formação em Saúde Coletiva e Integralidade: saberes e práticas de ensino nos cenários diversificados de aprendizagem Dissertação de Mestrado. Instituto de Medicina Social, Universidade Estadual do Rio de Janeiro. 2017.
Brasil. Ministério da Educação. Altos índices de desistência na graduação revelam fragilidade do ensino médio, avalia ministro. [Acesso: 28/5/2018] Disponível em: http://portal.mec.gov.br/ ultimas-noticias/212-educacao-superior-1690610854/40111- altos-indices-de-evasao-na-graduacao-revelam-fragilidade-do- ensino-medio-avalia-ministro.
UFRJ. Instituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva. Plano de Desenvolvimento Institucional. 2016. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, Instituto de Estudos em Saúde Coletiva, documento aprovado na Congregação de 29/11/2016.
Thurston WE, POTVIN L. Evaluability Assessment: A Tool for Incorporating Evaluation in Social Change Programmes Evaluation. 2003; 9(4).
Bezerra LCA, Alves CKA, Reis YAC, et ál. Identificação e caracterização dos elementos constituintes de uma intervenção: pré-avaliação da política Participa SUS. 2012.
Shadish WR, Cook TD, Levinson LC. Foundations of Evaluation Program: Theories of Practice. California; London: SAGE Publications, 1991.
Alkin MC. Evaluation Roots: A wider perspective of theorists” view and influences. California; London: SAGE Publications, 2004.
Coryn CLS, Noakes LA, Westine CD, et ál. A Systematic Review of Theory-Driven Evaluation Practice From 1990 to 2009. American Journal of Evaluation 2011; 32(2):199-226.
Chen HT. Practical Program Evaluation. London: Sage. 2005.
Chen HT, Rossi PH. Evaluating With Sense. The Theory-Driven Approach. Evaluation Review. 1983; 7(3).
Hudelson PM. World Health Organization. Division of Mental Health. Qualitative research for health programmes. Geneva. 1994. [Acesso: 22/05/2018] Disponível em: http://www.who.int/ iris/handle/10665/62315.
Jannuzzi PM. Eficiência econômica, eficácia procedural ou
efetividade social: Três valores em disputa na Avaliação de Políticas e Programas Sociais. Desenvolvimento em Debate. 2016; 4(1):117-42.
Cousins JB, Whitmore E. Framing Participatory Evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation. 2007; 80:105.
Scriven M. Evaluation Thesaurus. California. London. Sage Publications. 1991.
Tambellini AT, Camara VM. A Temática Saúde e Ambiente no Processo de Desenvolvimento do Campo da Saúde Coletiva: Aspectos Históricos, Conceituais e Metodológicos. Ciência & Saúde Coletiva 1998; 8:47-59.
Fróes-Asmus CIR, Câmara VM, Landrigam P, Claudio L A Systematic review of Children Environmental Health in Brazil. Ann. Glob. Health 2016; 82:132-48.
Cousins JB, Chouinard JA. Framing participatory evaluation. In: Participatory evaluation up close: an integration of research- based knowledge. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing. 2012; 17-38.
Fetterman DM, Rodríguez-Campos L, Zukoski AP. Collaborative, participatory, and empowerment evaluation: stakeholder involvement approaches. New York: The Guilford Press. 2017.
Rodríguez-Campos L, Rincones-Gómez R. Collaborative evaluations: step-by-step. Second edition. Stanford, California: Stanford Business Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press. 2013; 249.
Clavier C, et ál. A theory-based model of translation practices in public health participatory research. Sociology of Health & Illness, Henley-onThames. 2012; 34(5):791-805.
Abreu DMF, Santos EM, Cardoso GCP, et ál. Usos e influência de uma avaliação: Translação do Conhecimento? Revista Saúde em Debate 2017; 41:302-16.
Oliveira EA, Cardoso GCP, Santos EM, et ál. O apoiador local como ator estratégico na implementação do QualiSUS-Rede: engenheiros de conexão?. Revista Saúde em Debate 2017; 41:275- 89.
Hanney SR, González-Block MA. Evidence-informed health policy: are we beginning to get there at last? Health Res Policy Syst. 2009. [Acesso: 18/01/2018] Disponível em: https://doi. org/10.1186/1478-4505-7-30.
Potvin L, Clavier C. Actor-network Theory: The governance of intersectoral initiatives. In: Health Promotion and the Policy Process. Carole Clavier and Evelyne de Leeuw. Oxford University Press. 2010.
Collaborative, Participatory, and Empowerment Evaluation: Stakeholder Involvement Approaches. New York: Guilford Publications, Inc. 2018; 134.
Patton MQ. Essentials of Utilization Focused Evaluation. SAGE Publications, California. London, 2012.
Creswell JW, Plano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd ed. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. 2011; 457.
Pawson R. Middle Range Theory and Programme Theory Evaluation: From Provenance to Practice. Em: Leeuw F, Vassen J. Mind the Gap: Perspectives on Policy Evaluation and the Social Sciences, ed. Transaction Publishers. New Brunswick (USA) and London (UK). 2010; 171-202.
Latour B. Reassembling the Social an Introduction to Actor- Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. New York. 2005.
Petticrew M. When are complex interventions “complex”? When are simple interventions “simple”? The European Journal of Public Health. 2011; 21(4):397-8.
Leeuw F, Vassen J. Mind the Gap: Perspectives on Policy Evaluation and the Social Sciences. Transaction. 2005; 21-140.
The articles published in this journal are subject to the following terms and conditions:
- The journal retains copyright of the articles published, and encourages and permits their reuse under the licence indicated at point 2.
- The articles are published in the online edition of the journal under licence Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). They can be copied, used, disseminated, transmitted, and publicly displayed, providing that the authorship, URL address and the Journal are cited, and that no commercial use is made of them.
- The authors agree with terms of licence use of the journal, with the self-archiving conditions and with the open access policy.
- In the event of reuse of the articles published, the existence and specifications of the terms of licence use must be mentioned, in addition to citing the authorship and original source of the their publication.